A rubric the model actually follows
Explaining your criteria simply is easy. Getting a model to apply them the way your experts do is not. Every ambiguity in the rubric becomes a judgment call the model makes without you.
Bring unlabeled outputs and a one-sentence rubric. Sutro surfaces the cases where models disagree, learns your quality bar from expert feedback, and hands you a calibrated, deployable AI Function.
Pass or fail on agent traces. Quality grades on RAG answers. Policy checks on generated content. Using a model to grade outputs is the only evaluation approach that keeps up with production volume; human review doesn’t scale, and string metrics can’t read.
But a judge is only useful if it agrees with your experts. Out of the box it reflects the model’s defaults, not your quality bar. Closing that gap means building everything around it:
Explaining your criteria simply is easy. Getting a model to apply them the way your experts do is not. Every ambiguity in the rubric becomes a judgment call the model makes without you.
Agreement with your experts is the only score that matters. Proving it takes the right examples: hard cases worth an expert’s time, not a huge sample of easy calls.
Models update, prompts change, data drifts. An agreement rate you measured last quarter says little about the judge you’re running today. Recalibration is a process, not a task.
Building an AI Function isn’t about scaling general intelligence. It’s about teaching a model exactly how your organization wants a task performed. A judge is the purest case: you teach your quality bar on the hardest examples, and we handle the rest.
Unlike eval products that stop at monitoring, Sutro shapes behavior from your feedback rather than just measuring it. The judge you build is a deployable function, not a dashboard.
“Sutro saves our team countless hours, and it gives us the invaluable ability to measure, optimize, and prevent regressions against our domain expertise. It’s a must-have for serious AI developers.”