Clinical data quality checks

Flag consistency problems in synthetic clinical records for review.

Step 01

Define and Align

Upload sample data, define your output schema, and provide feedback on the hardest cases.

Output schema
ReviewYes / No

Whether the record contains a consistency issue requiring review.

  • true
  • false
Issue typesChoose any

The consistency problems found; empty when none.

  • unit_mismatch
  • date_conflict
  • missing_value
  • source_disagreement
Affected fieldsList of values

Field names that need correction or verification.

app.sutro.sh/functions/clinical-data-quality-checks
Collecting feedback · 1/3
Flag consistency problems in synthetic clinical records for review.
Example 1 of 3

Unit mismatch

Model input

Synthetic record: height_cm = 1.75; source says height 1.75 meters.

Model output
Review
Issue typesMultiple values
Affected fieldsMultiple values

Step 02

Model Sweep

Compare quality and cost on your examples, then choose a model or use Sutro’s default.

Compare models on expert agreement and cost. The interactive chart uses illustrative measurements.

Illustrative sweep · select Value or Best to use that model in your function.

Step 03

Deployment

Call Sutro Functions like any other software. Swap the model as soon as something more performant is released.

Selected modelWaiting for sweep results.

Real-time

import sutro as so

input_data = {
    "text": "Synthetic record: height_cm = 1.75; source says height 1.75 meters."
}

result = so.run_function(
    "clinical-data-quality-checks",
    input_data,
)

Batch

import sutro as so

job_id = so.batch_run_function(
    name="clinical-data-quality-checks",
    data="clinical_data_quality_checks.csv",
)
results = so.await_job_completion(job_id)

Ready to get started?

Book time with the team

Join the self-serve waitlist

What are your bottlenecks? (Select any that apply)